Volume III, Number 1 - ISSN 1084-9750 - November, 1996
Long-overdue greetings! It's been almost a year since publication
of the last issue of Ode News and many of you no doubt
have been wondering if this newsletter had fallen by the wayside.
We're sure you all have been rushing to your mailboxes every day
in eager anticipation of the next issue!? We apologize for our
extreme tardiness, but assure you that Ode News is alive
and well, and we hope it will appear in a more timely fashion
in the future. Although our masthead refers to the "occasional"
nature of this missive, it has been and remains our intent to
publish at least two issues per year.
One of the reasons for the lengthy absence of Ode News
was a building project here at 2 Gilbert Lane that has greatly
expanded the space available at our "editorial offices."
We have also increased our computing capabilities and added software
that should considerably facilitate publication of future editions.
We also now have a Web site on the Internet, so those with access
to cyberspace can read Ode News online. See page 11 for
more on this new, ongoing development.
Our mailing list continues to grow beyond all anticipation, and
now numbers over 200! Ode News is now being distributed
to readers in 17 states, despite the narrow geographic scope of
the newsletter's content. Which brings up a topic we have deliberated
since the very first issue. We began with the modest intent of
sharing our odonate sightings locally with a handful of people.
However, as our readership has grown and our own interest in odonates
has broadened beyond Cape Cod, we have continually debated the
pros and cons of expanding the newsletter's coverage. Not wishing
to bite off more than we can chew, we have pretty much resisted
any dramatic changes. Perhaps inevitably, however, "outside
interests" have resulted in a modest expansion in our geographic
coverage over the previous six issues. This current edition has
even more off-Cape news, such that we've added a section entitled
"Field Notes from Afar." We view this development with
a mix of excitement and trepidation. While we would love to see
a statewide, or even New England wide publication, we're not at
all sure that we're the ones to do it! Let us know your thoughts
Features in this issue include 1996 highlights from Cape Cod,
reports from the Connecticut River and Bluff Point, an update
from Rhode Island, the second part of Photographing Dragons, and
news about two new odonate books.
The summer of 1996 was wet and cool with very high water levels
at most sites, in sharp contrast to the very dry and warm conditions
of 1995. As if the summer was not wet enough, the fall brought
near-monsoon conditions, raising water levels higher than we have
ever experienced. While such dramatic fluctuations in weather
and water levels may have pronounced effects on many species,
we can only speculate on what these effects might be. Some species
seemed much reduced in numbers this year, while a few appeared
to be more numerous.
As part of the massive clean-up efforts at the Massachusetts Military
Reservation, Peter and Jeremiah Trimble were contracted to census
adult odonates at 10 sites in the vicinity of the military base.
The sites represented a variety of habitats and each was thoroughly
surveyed three times between late June and late August. This is
the first such census ever conducted in this area, and it may
be repeated next summer. Although the results have yet to be published,
there were a few surprises and some of the highlights are briefly
described in the species accounts below. We hope to have a more
complete description of this survey in a future issue of Ode
Topping the list of highlights this year were four species new
to Cape Cod: Furtive Forktail (Ischnura prognata - new
to New England!); Bar-winged Skimmer (Libellula axilena
- new to Massachusetts); Lance-tipped Darner (Aeshna constricta);
and Taiga Bluet (Coenagrion resolutum).
(Ischnura prognata): The greatest surprise this season
was the fortuitous capture of this large, southern forktail at
a densely vegetated vernal pool in Eastham on 2 June. Furtive
Forktails are secretive denizens of wooded swamps as far north
as Virginia. There is a record from New York, but the species
was previously unrecorded from New England and was quite unexpected!
This female was flying along the shaded shoreline when spotted
by Jackie Sones and caught by Dick Forster. Because of its large
size it was first thought to be a spreadwing (Lestes sp.)!
Subsequent visits to the site failed to turn up any other individuals,
so at this point we consider this to be an isolated case of vagrancy.
(Libellula axilena): The first Massachusetts record of
this southern species was provided by a male discovered by Blair
Nikula and Jeremiah Trimble at another of the Eastham vernal pools
on 6 July and captured the following day after more than an hour
of stalking! Bar-winged Skimmers occur regularly north to New
Jersey, and there are also a few New York records. They are known
to undergo northward movements at times, and Ginger Carpenter
captured Rhode Island's first last year, so their appearance here
was somewhat anticipated.
(Aeshna constricta): The Cape's first, a female, was netted
by Jeremiah Trimble at the Wellfleet Bay Wildlife Sanctuary in
South Wellfleet on 22 September. Lance-tipped Darners were numerous
at a number of sites in eastern Massachusetts and in Connecticut
this year, and Ginger Carpenter reported that the species has
been found on Block Island in the recent past, so we were on the
lookout for the first local record. These darners are most often
found hawking over open fields.
(Coenagrion resolutum): A male of this delicate, northern
damselfly was captured by Blair Nikula at a large vernal pool
in Bourne on 1 June, providing another first for Cape Cod. Previously,
this species was known to occur only as far south as a few sites
in extreme northern Massachusetts, so its appearance on the Cape
is surprising. No others were found despite subsequent searches.
(Aeshna mutata): This species appeared again, for the fourth
consecutive year, at the so-called "Frosted Pool" in
Eastham. A teneral male was photographed in a clearing near the
pool on 10 June, and two were seen patrolling over the pool on
15 June. Our inability to find this species elsewhere, even at
nearby pools, remains puzzling.
(Aeshna canadensis): A single male captured in Eastham
on 28 July provided the only Cape record of this species in 1996.
Although common in many portions of the state, there are only
a couple of definite Cape records in recent years. Whether Canada
Darners are scarce residents locally or merely occasional visitors
from the mainland remains unknown. To date, we are unaware of
any evidence of local breeding.
(Aeshna verticalis): At least four males were present at
a small bog in Mashpee on 31 August. This is only our second Cape
site for this species, the other also on the Upper Cape at a large,
densely vegetated pool in Bourne. Although local breeding has
not been confirmed, the patrolling behavior of males at these
two sites is suggestive.
(Basiaeschna janata): This is another species that appears
to be much scarcer on the Cape than inland. Our only sightings
this year were from the Punkhorn Conservation Area in Brewster,
an adjacent small stream in Harwich, and Moody Pond in Mashpee.
(Boyeria vinosa): The Fawn Darner is another dragon that
is common on the mainland, but apparently scarce and local on
Cape Cod. Our only records this year came from the Skunknet River
in Osterville, Mashpee/Wakeby Pond in Mashpee, and the Mashpee
High School. At the latter site, a very late female seen inside
the school building on 9 October was found dead the following
day. Additionally, a nymph (which eventually emerged) was found
along the Mashpee River-to our knowledge, the first proof of breeding
by this species on Cape Cod.
(Epiaeschna heros): In sharp contrast to last year, only
a handful of Swamp Darners were found this year. The only indication
of any movement was the sighting of 11 individuals passing Race
Point in Provincetown in an hour and a half on 15 June. Otherwise,
only a few were reported from various locations during the summer.
Most notable was the discovery of an Epiaeschna exuvia
in the Red Maple Swamp in Eastham on 18 July. To our knowledge,
this is the first evidence of this huge, southern dragon breeding
on Cape Cod.
Spinyleg (Dromogomphus spinosus): In her book, Ginger
Carpenter describes this large, handsome clubtail as "relatively
uncommon in our area, having been collected at only 5 locations,"
and in 1994 and 1995 only a few individuals were found on the
Cape. However, the Trimbles found them to be fairly common, though
elusive, at some of the large Upper Cape ponds they surveyed this
(Somatochlora tenebrosa): Individuals of this apparently
scarce, but inconspicuous species were captured in the Punkhorn
Conservation Area in Brewster and near the Skunknet River in Osterville.
A few additional sightings of unidentified Somatochloras may
have involved this species.
(Leucorrhinia frigida): The first Cape records in three
years of this small dragon came from a large pool in Bourne where
one male was captured on 1 June and several were seen on 15 June.
This is another species whose status in our area is unclear. Based
upon our rather limited experience and published accounts from
the past, the Frosted Whiteface appears to have declined in this
area, though it is still quite common elsewhere in Massachusetts.
(Lestes unguiculatus): Our only record this year of this
diminutive, easily overlooked spreadwing came from a small, densely
vegetated pool in Bourne on 22 June. This site is near a larger
pool where we found the species last year. We have now found Lyre-tipped
Spreadwings at just these two Bourne pools, at a large pool in
Eastham, and at a small pond in Sandwich; all four records have
involved single males. However, a female captured at the smaller
Bourne pool on 18 August this year appears to be this species
Eastern Red Damsel
(Amphiagrion saucium): Large numbers of this tiny red damselfly
were noted again at the Quashnet River bog in Mashpee, where as
many as 200 were seen on 9 June. To date, we have found this species
only in the vicinity of the Quashnet and Mashpee Rivers, though
there are older records from elsewhere on Cape Cod.
(Argia moesta): Prior to this summer, we had failed to
record this handsome damselfly on the Cape, though both Ginger
Carpenter and the Gibbs' found them in years past. It turns out
we simply were not looking in the right places, as the Trimbles
found them to be very common at several of the Upper Cape ponds
(e.g., Ashumet, John's, and Snake Ponds) they surveyed
(Chromagrion conditum): So far, we have found this distinctive
damselfly only in the Quashnet River watershed. As many as 80
were estimated to be present at the Quashnet bog on 9 June.
Big Bluet (Enallagma
durum): This largest of our bluets was found again at Mill
Pond in Yarmouth and Nobska Pond in Woods Hole. Additionally,
a few individuals were found among the masses of Familiar Bluets
(Enallagma civile) on John's and Mashpee Ponds in Mashpee,
Weeks and Triangle Ponds in Sandwich, and Ashumet Pond in Falmouth.
we again noted some migratory-type movements of dragonflies this
year, they were generally of a lesser magnitude than those recorded
a year ago. However, we were not in the field on at least a couple
days when movements were noted by others. The first flight was
on 21 May when Jackie Sones and Dick Forster saw over one hundred
dragons moving northward along the Outer Cape in Provincetown
and Truro. Among these were 62 Common Green Darners (Anax junius),
17 Spot-winged Gliders (Pantala hymenaea), and 14
unidentified gliders (Pantala spp.). The largest flight
occurred in Provincetown on 14 July, the day after the passage
of Tropical Storm Bertha. In two hours at Race Point, Blair Nikula
and Dick Forster counted 1,420 Spot-winged Gliders, 13 Common
Green Darners, and one Swamp Darner (Epiaeschna heros).
A couple of smaller movements were also noted in Provincetown
in June, and a friend reported "hundreds" of dragonflies
moving along the dunes in Wellfleet late in the afternoon of 5
July. The same observer also noted "hundreds" of dragonflies
along the outer beaches of Martha's Vineyard on 2 September, the
day following offshore passage of Hurricane Edouard. We are now
confident that dragonfly movements, particularly northward from
late spring through mid-summer, are an annual event on Cape Cod,
although the magnitude and species composition of these movements
may be highly variable.
Although adult populations of many odonates seem to vary, in some
cases extensively, from year to year, it is difficult, at best,
to detect these changes without intensive, regular surveys. Such
efforts, with one exception, have been lacking on Cape Cod. With
that caveat in mind, we offer the following impressions of 1996
population levels. The reasons for any of these variations remain
unknown, but last year's extremely low water levels and this year's
contrastingly very high levels may have played some role.
Population levels of several species, including a couple of the
most common and widespread odonates in this area, seemed to be
noticeably low compared with the previous two years. Perhaps most
striking in this regard were Eastern Forktails (Ischnura verticalis),
normally common to abundant at most freshwater habitats. Sites
where we have recorded hundreds on occasion in the past in most
cases hosted only dozens or fewer this season. Common Green Darners
(Anax junius) were also scarce, at least until late summer
when modest numbers of young individuals appeared.
We also saw very few Wandering Gliders (Pantala flavescens)
this year. This highly mobile species was very common last year,
with occasional counts numbering into the hundreds. On the other
hand, Spot-winged Gliders (Pantala hymenaea), which were
seen in only small numbers last year, were widespread and at times
abundant this year. In addition to the large movement witnessed
in Provincetown (see Movements section above), about 150 were
counted on Morris Island in Chatham on 21 July, and there were
many reports of swarms of 10-30 individuals. The dramatic, sharply
contrasting differences in the numbers of these two related species
over the past two seasons is interesting-we'll be keeping a close
eye on them in the future in hopes of learning more about these
Another species that seemed more common than usual this year was
the Painted Skimmer (Libellula semifasciata). Dozens of
this colorful dragon were present at some sites this year, particularly
small, grassy pools. Painted Skimmers have been seen in apparently
migratory movements of dragonflies, and noticeable fluctuations
in their populations, particularly near the northern limits of
their range, have been reported elsewhere.
Sweetflag Spreadwings (Lestes forcipatus) were present in great abundance this year. Clouds of tenerals were flushed from a number of sites in July, particularly grassy pools and small, densely vegetated ponds. By early August, hundreds of breeding pairs were evident at many of those same sites. While Sweetflag Spreadwings are one of the most common Lestes on Cape Cod, their populations this year seemed to reach exceptional levels.
At long last there is now an official list of the common names
of North American dragonflies and damselflies. Earlier this year,
ballots (based upon the list originally drawn up by Sidney Dunkle
and Dennis Paulson) were distributed to the membership of the
Dragonfly Society of the Americas and the results of that election
were tabulated and published recently in the Society's newsletter,
Argia. While a few of the chosen names are disappointing
to us, this was inevitable and we're quite pleased with the vast
majority of them. It is a great relief to have such a list and
we will be using these names hereafter (and hope that all other
publications will as well). If you would like a copy of the list,
send us a S.A.S.E.
Quite a few of the names have changed from those used in previous issues of Ode News (and in Ginger Carpenter's Dragonflies and Damselflies of Cape Cod). The changes are as follows:
|Violet Dancer (Argia fumipennis)||Variable Dancer|
|Bog Bluet (Enallagma aspersum)||Azure Bluet|
|Civil Bluet (E. civile)||Familiar Bluet|
|Doubleday's Bluet (E. doubledayi)||Atlantic Bluet|
|Lateral Bluet (E. laterale)||New England Bluet|
|Red Bluet (E. pictum)||Scarlet Bluet|
|Barrens Bluet (E. recurvatum)||Pine Barrens Bluet|
|Speartail (Ischnura hastata)||Citrine Forktail|
|Common Forktail (I. verticalis)||Eastern Forktail|
|Spring Blue Darner (Aeshna mutata)||Spatterdock Darner|
|Long-legged Green Darner (Anax longipes)||Comet Darner|
|Harlequin Bog Darner (Gomphaeschna furcillata)||Harlequin Darner|
|Sand Dragon (Progomphus obscurus)||Common Sanddragon|
|Swift River Cruiser (Macromia illinoiensis)||Illinois River Cruiser|
|Prince (Epitheca princeps)||Prince Baskettail|
|Saltmarsh Dragonfly (Erythrodiplax berenice)||Seaside Dragonlet|
|Johnny Whiteface (Leucorrhinia intacta)||Dot-tailed Whiteface|
|Goldenwings (Libellula auripennis)||Golden-winged Skimmer|
|Black-faced Skimmer (L. cyanea)||Spangled Skimmer|
|Little Corporal (L. deplanata)||Blue Corporal|
|Corporal Skimmer (L. exusta)||White Corporal|
|Damson Skimmer (L. incesta)||Slaty Skimmer|
|The Widow (L. luctuosa)||Widow Skimmer|
|Wandering Globetrotter (Pantala flavescens)||Wandering Glider|
|Spot-winged Globetrotter (P. hymenaea)||Spot-winged Glider|
|Amberwings (Perithemis tenera)||Eastern Amberwings|
|Saffron-bordered Meadowfly (Sympetrum costiferum)||Saffron-winged Meadowhawk|
|Ruby Meadowfly (S. rubicundulum)||Ruby Meadowhawk|
|Band-winged Meadowfly (S. semicinctum)||Band-winged Meadowhawk|
|Yellow-legged Meadowfly (S. vicinum)||Yellow-legged Meadowhawk|
|Violet-masked Glider (Tramea carolina)||Carolina Saddlebags|
Featured in this new section devoted to news from elsewhere in
New England are some exciting finds from the Connecticut River
in Massachusetts, a note on a fall dragonfly movement at Bluff
Point in Connecticut, and a brief update on some species new to
David Wagner and Mike Thomas
The stretch of the Connecticut River that runs north from the
Sunderland Bridge in north central Massachusetts is one of New
England's most remarkable sites for dragonfly watching. Ralph
Charlton (Kansas State University) was the first to document the
importance of the site. On his first visit on 5 June 1991, he
found Cobra Clubtail (Gomphus vastus - exuviae abundant
but no adults) and Skillet Clubtail (G. ventricosus - one
adult). A few years later he returned on 7 July 1994 and found
cast exuviae of both Riverine Clubtail (Stylurus amnicola)
and Arrow Clubtail (S. spiniceps). [Charlton may
also have shells (exuviae) of Midland Clubtail (Gomphus fraternus)
and Elusive Clubtail (Stylurus notatus) but he has
not yet sent these out for verification.]
We made three trips to the site this summer: one in June, a second in July, and the last in August. Mike visited the river on 15 June 1996, and observed a remarkable hatch of gomphids along both banks of the river, beginning about 8:00 AM and ending around 10:00 AM. Over this period more than twenty eclosing (emerging) Cobra Clubtails were noted on the sunny side of tree trunks and logs that issued directly out of the water (river level was high). Eclosion took approximately 20 minutes, with an additional 10 minutes to fully expand and harden the wings (n=9). Tenerals then flew 15-25 feet up into trees growing along the river bank. At one point six adults were observed rising up to the canopy-for some reason sunlight virtually dances off the wings of tenerals. Another 50 or more shells were noted, with most three to nine feet above the water. In addition, one recently emerged male Spine-crowned Clubtail (Gomphus abbreviatus) was noted on a tree bole, just a few inches above the water's surface, and a few shells of Stygian Shadowdragons (Neurocordulia yamaskanensis) were recovered from tree boles.
We both returned to the river on 22 July 1996. We put in at North
Sunderland and then drifted down to the bridge, stopping to look
for exuviae on several sandy beaches and both of the islands.
Three hours of paddling and "beach combing" yielded
only 20 or so. (Presumably many shells had been washed away by
Hurricane Bertha which swept through the area during the second
week of July.) Our haul included: 1 Zebra Clubtail
(Stylurus scudderi - fresh); 1 Riverine Clubtail (fresh),
10-12 Arrow Clubtails (fresh), 5 Cobra Clubtails (old)
and 2 Stygian Shadowdragons (old).
We beached our canoe at the northern tip of the second island
for a walk about the flooded willows around 11:00 AM. Perched
about seven feet above the water was a male Cobra Clubtail. In
a clump of willows, perhaps no more than a foot or two above the
water's surface, we roused a pair that presumably had just broken
up. We then paddled down the channel between the first island
and the east shore. Here the river was swift but without riffles
(at least during the high water period when we visited). We saw
no less than 10 Cobra Clubtails over territory. Males very much
favored the sun-shade interface that ran along the east side of
the river, drifting in and out of the sun. They became almost
invisible whenever they entered the shade. Interactions among
males were frequent but short-lived, lasting but a second or two.
Although males appeared to be mostly in "display mode,"
they were observed taking prey as well. In full sun the yellow
on the club was dramatic and visible from quite a distance even
though the Cobra Clubtail has the least amount of yellow of any
of the New England clubtails in the subgenus Gomphurus.
Because of the vagaries in lighting, males were very inconspicuous
on the river overall and easily might have been missed, but once
we knew where to look they could be observed readily. Males hovered
8-20 inches above the water with the abdomen raised about 20°
above horizontal, the flared yellow and black club providing a
Males showed a level of fearlessness about our canoe and little
respect for our nets, often flying close for inspection, landing
briefly on the canoe and even our nets. The most befuddling pass
came from a male that bisected the canoe as both Mike and I sat
at the ready. After hovering just upriver from us it suddenly
blistered over the middle of the canoe. Had either of us swung
the other would likely have been knocked unconscious. Taking swipes
at the males as we drifted broadside down the river was great
sport -a couple of efforts nearly capsized the canoe.
At the southern tip of the first island we paddled to a large
log jam that, predictably, had four or five Black-shouldered Spinylegs
(Dromogomphus spinosus) perched atop. Blue-fronted Dancers
(Argia apicalis) were quite common along the sun-shade
interface of the boat launch area and parking lot near the west
end of the Sunderland Bridge. They were not seen at the river,
preferring off-river perching sites, with the ground being favored
Our last trip was on 27 August 1996, when we were joined by Dave
McLain and Fred Morrison. Again we put in at North Sunderland
off of Falls Road. In contrast to the two previous visits the
river was low. Shell collecting was very slow, perhaps two Cobra
Clubtails (old), four Arrow Clubtails (newish) and one Riverine
Clubtail (newish) were taken by the four of us.
The biggest surprises were adults of American Rubyspot (Hetaerina
americana - three, including one teneral) and Big Bluet (Enallagma
durum - one). To the best of our knowledge this is one of
the most northerly inland sites for the latter species in the
Northeast, including New York (though on the coast it has been
recorded as far north as Acadia National Park in Maine). We netted
an old female Cobra Clubtail; her colors were dull and a bit washed
out. Later, from 11:30 AM to 12:15 PM, we saw two males over the
water, in the middle of the channel, toward the west bank-this
time in full sun!?
The portion of the river that had Cobra Clubtails on our previous
trip now had a new resident-while working our way down the east
shore we observed about 30 individuals of a mystery gomphid, especially
between the second island (north of bridge) and the east bank,
from about 10:00 AM to 12:00 PM. They seemed nervous and only
rarely approached within 10 feet of us. They were no more approachable
in the canoe. After nearly 60 minutes the four of us were still
scoreless, three of us never even got a swing. (We did see a 15-inch
largemouth bass rocket out of the water to snatch one...remarkable!)
It's our guess that the gomphid was the Arrow Clubtail. Compared
to the Cobra Clubtails on the same stretch of the river a month
earlier, they seemed more nervous, not as inclined to hover, more
of a patroller, and moved quickly over the water at heights of
only 5-8 inches. Additionally, they appeared to be a bit larger
and less brightly marked. The club was not pronounced on the wing
and the abdomen was held only about 5° above the horizontal.
Several individuals were seen to hit the water 2-4 times (with
three being the norm), apparently for a drink, then rise into
the nearby canopy. The one individual that took only two drinks
hit the water rather hard the second time, and maybe decided it
was best to "get out of Dodge." This species also liked
the sun-shade interface but didn't seem as linked to it as Cobra
Clubtails had been on the 22nd of July: It seemed to remain in
shady areas for longer periods, but also spent more time patrolling
portions of the river in full sun. More than 15 Illinois River
Cruisers (Macromia illinoiensis) were seen as well.
Even if Midland Clubtails and Elusive Clubtails turn out not to
be resident, this stretch of the river has at least five rare
Odonata listed as S1 (Critically Imperiled) or S2 (Imperiled)
species in Massachusetts: Skillet Clubtail, Cobra Clubtail, Riverine
Clubtail, Zebra Clubtail, and Arrow Clubtail (all Gomphidae).
In addition, the populations of Stygian Shadowdragon (Corduliidae),
American Rubyspot (Calopterygidae), and Big Bluet (Coenagrionidae)
at Sunderland strike us as noteworthy.
Odonata are very vulnerable when they first eclose from their
nymphal skins. A single gust of wind or wave can mean doom. Both
Ralph Charlton and Fred Morrison had occasion to witness the results
of boat wakes along the Connecticut River that effectively crippled
a newly emerging gomphid. Taxa that eclose on the beach or very
close to the water (e.g., Stylurus) are especially susceptible.
One reason the Sunderland site may be so rich in dragonflies is
because speed limits are so low there that few motor boaters choose
to navigate this part of the river.
Our thanks to Dave Wagner and Mike Thomas, two of Connecticut's most active and knowledgeable odonatists, for this contribution to Ode News - eds.
Bluff Point, located along the southeastern shore of Connecticut,
may very well turn out to be one of the better places to observe
autumn dragonfly movements in New England. Part of an 806-acre
coastal reserve in Groton, the point juts down into Fisher's Island
Sound-a perfect set up to concentrate migrants. This fall the
Hartford Current published an article discussing Bluff Point's
recent emergence as a new birding "hotspot." When Jeremiah
Trimble started school at Connecticut College in nearby New London,
we were looking for such spots, not only to observe birds, but
On a few different mornings in early September Jeremiah and I
were lucky enough to witness the early morning flight of hundreds
of migrant songbirds at Bluff Point. On 30 September, however,
we were there in the afternoon and caught up with some dragonflies
moving along the coast. From 1:45 PM to 3:45 PM we counted the
The Aeshnas were unexpected; we hadn't heard of this genus being recorded in migratory movements before. Although it is quite possible that they were local residents which had wandered out to the coast, we did observe them moving along the beach, flying in the same direction as the other dragons. Who knows what will turn up at Bluff Point in the future needless to say, we'll be spending more time there! We'll keep you updated!
Ginger Carpenter reports that she and Nina Briggs added nine species of odonates to the Rhode Island state list this season. Foremost among these was a Taper-tailed Darner (Gomphaeschna antilope) caught by Ginger; this is a southern species not previously recorded anywhere in New England! It's not yet clear whether this individual was a vagrant or part of a local breeding population. Also new was another southern species, the Great Blue Skimmer (Libellula vibrans). Although this species was found in several Massachusetts locations last year, to our knowledge the Rhode Island individual was unique in New England in 1996. Rounding out the list of new species were seven that were more expected: Blue-fronted Dancer (Argia apicalis); Dusky Dancer (Argia translata); Citrine Forktail (Ischnura hastata); Mottled Darner (Aeshna clepsydra); Black-shouldered Spinyleg (Dromogomphus spinosus); Spine-crowned Clubtail (Gomphus abbreviatus); and Mocha Emerald (Somatochlora linearis).
In the first part of this article, I described the equipment I
use to photograph odonates and other insects. Here I will briefly
discuss film and then some of the other considerations in this
type of photography. As in the previous installment, I have assumed
that the reader understands basic photographic principles.
Photographers today are blessed (or cursed, depending upon your
point of view) with a rich and somewhat bewildering array of film
choices. The first choice is between slide or print film. I shoot
slide film exclusively for several reasons: 1) I occasionally
give slide programs; 2) slides are preferred by most publishers;
3) the color in slide film tends to be somewhat more vivid; and
4) slide film is less expensive to process. There are so many
good slide films on the market today you really can't go very
wrong. In general, any of the films produced by Kodak or Fuji
will provide excellent results. Film speed is an important consideration:
as a rule, the slower the film speed the better the quality. Film
speeds in the range of 50-100 ISO provide the best results, but
because of their slow speed are more difficult to work with, in
most cases requiring the use of a tripod or flash to provide sharp
results. For the past couple of years I have been using Fuji Sensia
(100 ISO) almost exclusively. However, Kodachrome (64 ISO), Kodak
Elite (50 & 100 ISO), Kodak Lumiere (100 ISO), and Fuji Velvia
(50 ISO) are all superb films. Once you find a film you like,
it's a good idea to stick with it, as over time you will develop
a feel for its nuances.
Once you have chosen your equipment and film, it's time to head
into the field and start exposing some film. The first step, of
course, is to find some bugs -a relatively easy task if the sun
is shining. Cloudy days provide more of a challenge, for not only
are odonates much less active, but light levels are reduced as
well. However, a high, thin overcast affords a soft, even light
that can be very attractive.
One of the easiest groups to photograph are the skimmers (Libellulidae).
These are large dragonflies, the males of which are often brightly
colored and tend to perch in the open on emergent vegetation,
exposed branches, logs, or sandy shorelines. Additionally, the
males are often territorial and even when spooked will frequently
return to the same or a nearby perch, permitting the patient photographer
multiple opportunities. Most of the other dragonfly groups are
very difficult to photograph, although you will, on rare occasions,
come across unusually cooperative individuals. Clubtails (Gomphidae)
often sit in the open, but tend to be quite skittish and when
flushed, almost never return to the same perch. Darners (Aeshnidae)
and Emeralds (Corduliidae) spend considerable time on the wing,
often at altitudes of 10-20 feet, and when they land it is usually
hanging from a branch high in the shadows of a tree, far out of
the range-and generally out of sight-of the frustrated photographer.
Most damselflies are relatively cooperative, but because of their
small size, require a very close approach: in most cases two feet
or less. Even the most cooperative subject will become jittery
when a potential predator lurks within two feet!
Once you have located a subject, there are several considerations
to take into account before beginning your approach. First, what
type of photograph are you after? Do you simply want a picture
of a dragonfly? Or are you interested in a more artistic rendering
of the subject? Perhaps you wish to obtain an identifiable portrait
of a particular species. This latter has been my primary objective
over the past couple of years. (As most of our readers will readily
attest, the biggest frustration facing the aspiring odonatist
is the paucity of illustrations available in any one source. Field
guides, with a couple of notable exceptions on the regional level,
are lacking and it's very difficult to learn what some of these
magnificent creatures look like. In hopes of overcoming this obstacle,
I have undertaken a concerted effort to photograph all the 175+
species found in New England.)
Another important consideration, as in any photograph, is lighting.
If you're trying for a recognizable image of the species, you'll
want the light at your back so that the subject is evenly and
well-lighted and the exposure relatively straightforward. For
an artistic approach, side-lighting or even back-lighting may
produce a more interesting image, although you'll have to be very
careful of the exposure. Backlighting will often result in underexposed
images if you rely on your camera's automatic exposure capabilities;
it's safest to adjust your exposures manually.
Before beginning an approach, you also need to decide whether
you want to photograph the insect from the side or above (or perhaps
even head on), as this, in combination with the direction of the
light, will determine the angle at which you approach. Most damselflies,
with the possible exception of the spreadwings (Lestidae), are
best photographed from the side. Dragonflies, on the other hand,
are most often (and in many instances most attractively) photographed
from above, although side views are often crucial for identification
purposes. A particularly cooperative subject may permit you both
dorsal and lateral shots. However, impenetrable vegetation, deep
water, or a host of other obstacles may prevent an approach from
the angle you desire, in which case the only options are to make
due with whatever angle and lighting are available, or to move
on to another subject. In the case of some of the territorial
perchers, such as many of the skimmers (Libellulidae), flushing
the bug might result in it landing in a more favorable position
Also think about whether a horizontal or vertical format will
provide the most pleasing image. In many cases, a standard horizontal
shot will be best, but for those species which hang from perches
(e.g., Darners [Aeshnidae], Emeralds [Corduliidae], and the Spreadwinged
Damsels [Lestidae]) a vertical image may be preferable.
Once you begin your approach, move slowly, increasingly so the
closer you get to the insect. Most (if not all) species seem particularly
sensitive to lateral movements, thus the importance of choosing
your angle of approach beforehand to minimize any motion once
you get close to the insect.
One of the greatest difficulties in any close-up photography is
obtaining enough depth of field to insure that as much of the
subject as possible is in focus. I always try to shoot with an
f-stop of f16 or smaller, though that is not always feasible.
One of the advantages of using flash is that you will be able
to choose any f-stop you desire, without the trade-off of a slower
shutter speed. In any event, before pushing the shutter, be sure
the film plane (i.e., camera back) is as parallel to the insect's
body as possible. In other words, both the insect's head and the
tip of its abdomen should be the same distance from the camera.
The lighting in close-up photography is often very tricky. Although
the automatic exposure capabilities of modern cameras are remarkably
accurate in most instances, I still prefer to set my exposures
manually. If a picture comes back poorly exposed, I at least know
that the error was probably mine and not the camera's. To increase
the chances of obtaining properly exposed images, I always bracket
my exposures extensively. When I locate a cooperative subject,
it's not unusual for me to fire off a roll or two of film in a
matter of minutes, particularly if it's a species I've not photographed
before. This can result in many usable slides of the same image,
but that's fine with me: It's much less expensive to make duplicates
in the camera than to have a photo-lab do it later.
Always pay attention to the background. This is the rule I violate
most frequently, to my continual frustration. No matter how well
the subject is lighted and composed, a distracting background
can greatly detract from, and in the worst cases virtually ruin,
an otherwise fine image. Generally, the most pleasing backgrounds
are those that are uniform with little contrast, such as water
or a dense stand of grasses. The farther the background is from
the subject, the more likely it will be rendered as a pleasing,
out-of-focus blur of color and texture. Often you will have little
or no control over the background. However, when working at very
close distances, even a slight shift of the camera position-a
fraction of an inch in many cases-can result in a dramatic change
in the background and make a big difference in the quality of
the final image. Also keep an eye out for shadows cast across
a portion of the subject. Even the smallest blade of grass can
cast a shadow that, while not particularly evident in the field,
can be distractingly obvious in the photo.
One method for photographing the more elusive species, if you're
not too concerned with the artistic aspects of the results, is
to capture the insect (for many species, a difficult undertaking
in itself!) and then pose it. Many dragonflies are surprisingly
cooperative after they've been in the hand for a few minutes and,
when placed in a natural pose, will sit for a minute or two, sometimes
longer, affording the opportunity for at least a few quick shots.
Curiously, damselflies are much less cooperative in this regard.
Before placing the bug, pick a suitable, well-lighted perch and
get the camera in place and ready to shoot. Chilling the bug,
either by placing it in a cooler for a while or by dunking its
abdomen in the water for a minute or so will often immobilize
it for a time. Purists will find posing the subject distasteful-as
do I. Be advised, as well, that a posed dragonfly rarely appears
completely natural and an experienced odonatist will be able to
detect such photos. Nevertheless, some species are virtually impossible
to find, never mind photograph, perched in the wild; obtaining
photos of these species often requires less than "pure"
Finally, keep in mind the three "P"s: practice, patience, and persistence. No matter how good your equipment, there is simply no substitute for experience-and no way to acquire experience without spending time, time, and more time in the field. Be prepared for frequent frustrations; accept them and keep plugging away. Take your time: Rushed photos invariably reveal themselves through fuzzy images, poor exposures, distracting backgrounds, annoying shadows, or assorted other maladies. Of course, the quest may be of much greater interest to you than the results, in which case ignore everything you've just read and simply go out with your camera and have a good time! The most important thing is to enjoy and appreciate these amazing creatures. If you can learn something about both dragonflies and photography in the process, all the better!
Ode News is now online! Through the efforts of Jackie Sones, with technical assistance and encouragement from Fahy Bygate, we now have a Web site where Internet surfers can access back issues of Ode News. Also available at the site are over 100 links to other odonate-related Web sites from throughout the world, as well as a checklist of Cape Cod odonates. Many species on the checklist are linked to photos and we hope soon to have photos of virtually all Cape Cod odonates on the site. The site address is:
We also have an e-mail address:
If you have a chance to view our Web site, let us know what you think. We're always happy to hear your suggestions and criticisms.
One of the biggest events in North American odonatology this year
was the publication of The Damselflies of North America by
Minter Westfall and Michael May. This long-awaited 649-page
book covers all 161 species of North American damselflies (Zygoptera),
including a few from northern Mexico that have not yet been recorded
in the U.S.
The Damselflies of North America is not a field guide;
it is a manual geared toward identification in the hand and/or
the laboratory. Although there are eight plates of color photographs,
only 31 species representing 20 of the 28 genera are illustrated.
There are many black-and-white illustrations, both photos and
drawings, of terminal appendages and other anatomical features
that are critical for identification, but which are visible only
in the hand and usually only with magnification. However, there
are also some drawings of thoracic and abdominal patterns that
can be useful for field identification.
The 58-page introduction includes an extensive discussion of adult
and larval morphology, as well as sections titled "Life Cycle,"
"Adult Behavior," "Larval Behavior," "Physiology,"
"Biogeography," and "Habitats and Conservation."
The species accounts comprise 525 pages and are detailed and technical.
The book concludes with an impressive 14-page glossary and 26-page
This monumental production is destined to be THE damselfly reference
for many years to come. Although beginners may find it a bit overwhelming,
anyone seriously interested in odonates will want it on their
bookshelf. It can be ordered directly from the International Odonate
Research Institute, c/o Division of Plant Industry, P. O. Box
147100, Gainesville, FL 32614-7100. The price is $69.50 plus $5.00
shipping. Through the end of the year, a 15% discount is available
for members of the Dragonfly Society of the Americas and students.
This and other odonate books are also available from Flora and Fauna Books, P. O. Box 15718, Gainesville, FL 32604 and from Patricia Ledlie Bookseller Inc., P. O. Box 90, Buckfield, ME 04220 (207-336-2778).
Another new publication, "The Dragonflies and Damselflies of Algonquin Provincial Park" by Matt Holder (Alqonquin Park Technical Bulletin No. 11), will be of interest to everyone, particularly beginners. This 40-page booklet contains species accounts and full color paintings the 36 most common odonate species in the park; 35 of these species also occur in southern New England. The species accounts are clearly written and contain a wealth of useful information for the field observer. The seven page introduction covers some of the basics of dragonfly biology and the book ends with a glossary and park checklist (85 species). Not only is this delightful publication very well done, it is also one of the biggest bargains in the publication industry today: the price is only $2.95 Canadian! Order from: The Friends of Algonquin Park, P. O. Box 248, Whitney, ONT, K0J 2M0 (credit cards accepted). Order several and give them to your friends!
Editorial Staff & Production Blair Nikula and Jackie Sones
Fahy Bygate, Jackie Sones, and Jeremiah Trimble
Ode News is available at no charge (for now!) to anyone interested.
If you have any questions, comments, or contributions, or wish
to be placed on the mailing list ,
write to: Ode News, 2 Gilbert Lane, Harwich Port, MA 02646, or send e-mail to: email@example.com.
Return to Index of Back Issues
Back to Ode News Home Page